The Wrong History

Yesterday, The Guardian reported on what it described as Britain’s biggest vinyl counterfeiting case to date.¹ Rehan Ahmed, a Londoner who had been running his operation since 2017, was sentenced to three and a half years in prison after police found 15,000 records and the equipment used to make them. His customers thought they were buying records by Taylor Swift, Kendrick Lamar, Frank Ocean, and others. They were not. Or were they?

»He wasn’t just faking the music. He was faking the object that carries it«

The most interesting detail in the article was what the police didn’t find: a cutting lathe.

A lathe is the machine used to cut the master disc from which records are pressed. Ahmed didn’t have one, which suggests his masters weren’t cut from original recordings at all – he bought an LP, then copied it. That likely made his fakes worse, not better: investigators described the seized stock as warped, with »dreadful« sound and »awful« printing quality. It also meant he wasn’t just faking the music. He was faking the object that carries it.

Philosopher Walter Benjamin’s famous argument about mechanical reproduction begins with the problem of the original: what happens to a unique work once it can be reproduced indefinitely?² Vinyl never faces that problem, because it was never unique to begin with – it was invented for reproduction. There’s no single authentic copy of an album that all the others imitate. There’s only a legitimate production process that creates thousands of authorised copies. Ahmed inserted himself into that process one step too late. The interesting question isn’t what makes an original different from a copy, but what makes one copy legitimate and another illegitimate when they are materially almost identical.

Art critic John Berger got close to this in his book Ways of Seeing.³ Once reproduction becomes ubiquitous, an original’s value has less to do with what it shows than with its status as the original. Price and rarity are treated almost as marks of spiritual value rather than market value. But the market is clearly there: UK vinyl sales grew for the eighteenth consecutive year running in 2025, up 13.3% to 7.6 million units.⁴ In the US, led by Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl, the format’s retail value passed $1bn for the first time in four decades.⁵ Limited editions now regularly sell for around £40. Ahmed’s fraud wasn’t opportunistic. In a sense, it was a rational response to a market that had made authenticity expensive.

In Languages of Art, philosopher Nelson Goodman argues that some works don’t depend on a single physical original at all: a performance of a symphony is genuine if it complies with the score, whoever plays it.⁶ Other works do, even when they exist as multiples. An etching pulled from a plate is only genuine if it was struck from the original plate: a later duplicate, however perfect, is not. A vinyl record is an etching, not a score. What makes a pressing real isn’t how it sounds, but whether it came from the sanctioned plate.

Ahmed’s fake records expose this distinction. You can’t necessarily see the fraud by looking at the record. And you can’t necessarily hear it, either. To establish that the records were counterfeit, investigators had to contact the rights-holders. In this case, the British Phonographic Industry contacted 108 labels and artists’ representatives to establish the status of the records.

The authenticity of the object was somewhere outside the object. It existed in contracts, licences, manufacturing records, payments, permissions, and relationships between institutions. A legitimate record has a history that connects it to an artist, a record label, a manufacturer, and a sanctioned production run. A counterfeit can reproduce the physical result while severing those connections.

This is perhaps a more unsettling version of Benjamin’s problem. Mechanical reproduction didn’t just make objects less unique. It made us increasingly dependent on invisible systems for deciding which reproduced objects count as real. And sometimes those systems leave gaps. The Guardian notes that Frank Ocean’s Channel Orange, released digitally in 2012, didn’t receive an official vinyl edition until 2025. For thirteen years there was demand for a physical object that the legitimate supply chain didn’t provide. Counterfeiters didn’t just exploit a desire for something rare. They supplied something the official market had failed to provide.

Perhaps that’s what a counterfeit really is. Not necessarily an object that is materially wrong, but an object with the wrong history. A good fake doesn’t just imitate a thing. It reveals what we were using to decide that the thing was real.

References