The Life of the Gift

Yesterday, following China’s latest pair of pandas arriving in Atlanta and Donald Trump’s gift of a bald eagle statue to Xi Jinping in return, the Guardian asked what diplomatic gifts mean and how countries choose one.¹ France gave America the Statue of Liberty. China gives pandas. Japan gave Washington cherry trees. Countries have exchanged puppies, tulips, and bells. There’s even a diplomatic gift that was never really a gift at all: the Trojan horse.

»Self-interest is what starts a gift moving. Sincerity is just time, added afterward, and time doesn’t ask the beginning’s permission«

Anthropologist Marcel Mauss’s 1925 study The Gift argued that gifts are never really free: they create obligations to give, to receive, and to reciprocate.² The object isn’t as important as the relationship forming around it. Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu added something sharper: the gap in time between giving and returning is what lets a transaction disguise itself as generosity.³ Hand over a bottle of wine and get a scarf worth the same amount in return, and everyone recognises a trade. Wait months, then send back something of similar value, and the same exchange passes as friendship. But notice that both theories describe only the moment of exchange. Neither says anything about what happens to the object afterward, once nobody is watching the reciprocity anymore.

The pandas Xi Jinping gave Trump this week are still suspended inside that moment. Since the 1980s, China’s »gifted« pandas have actually arrived on ten-year loans, with recipient zoos paying roughly a million dollars a year toward conservation work.⁴ The language of friendship survives the fact that the gift is legally a lease, because calling it a gift does diplomatic work that calling it rent doesn’t. The fiction holds only for as long as nobody bothers to look at what’s actually being exchanged.

But a gift, unlike a lease, doesn’t stay under the giver’s control – it’s more like a move in chess, which hands the turn to someone else. An intention of generosity can produce gratitude, resentment, or nothing at all; the giver’s plan is only one ingredient in what the object becomes. The Statue of Liberty shows how far this drift goes. It was also a message meant for France itself: liberal politician Édouard Laboulaye and sculptor Frédéric Bartholdi hoped that celebrating American liberty might push Napoleon III into permitting more of it at home. It wasn’t even a clean transfer between governments: France ran short of funds, and the publisher Joseph Pulitzer crowdfunded the pedestal through his newspaper from more than 120,000 ordinary readers, most giving less than a dollar.⁵

In 1976, Queen Elizabeth gave French president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing a black Labrador puppy. A moment earlier it had simply been a puppy; now it carried an intention, an expectation, a debt. It grew up into mostly a dog again – the president loved it, and spoke English to it all its life – though it remained, always, the dog that had once been given. The gift status disappeared. The gift history didn’t.

In 1912, Japan gave Washington thousands of cherry trees. The trees kept growing regardless of what anyone intended: they became a landscape, then a season, then an image of the city itself. Their origin remains part of their history, but that history no longer stops there. Which is where the answer starts to come into focus: the calculation Mauss and Bourdieu describe only has to run for as long as the exchange itself takes. What happens next belongs to time and use, not to anyone’s continued belief in the gesture’s generosity. A tree doesn’t need spectators to keep blooming. Self-interest is what starts a gift moving. Sincerity is just time, added afterward, and time doesn’t ask the beginning’s permission.

The Trojan horse is what happens when a gift is built never to let that second stage arrive: its openness is fraudulent, the giver has already decided the receiver’s next move, and the horse can never become just a horse.

A good enough gift keeps living long after the exchange that produced it is forgotten, until it belongs to neither the giver nor the receiver – only to itself. The cherry trees still bloom in Washington every spring, and almost nobody who stops to admire them is thinking about Japan. They are no longer a gift. They are trees that were once a gift, and have since become something else. An exchange ends when the account is settled. A gift ends when no one remembers there ever was one.

References